Contact Us

You build, we secure.

Here is our approach, refined over many iterations.

80% competition, 20% collaboration.

3-5 world-class security researchers put their best efforts during a fierce competition to achieve maximum coverage of the codebase and identify all the critical bugs.

For the final 20% of the timeline they work together to maximize the impact of the issues and cover underexplored areas.

They also triage and verify the bug leads generated by our comprehensive internal AI workflow.

Compete80%
Collaborate20%
01

Independent, competitive review

80% of timeline
  • No shared notes, no groupthink
  • Each auditor pairs their own AI workflows with manual auditing
  • Every individual finding counts toward the final leaderboard
02

AI lead generation

In parallel
  • Typically 30-40 leads, scaled to codebase size and complexity
  • Leads, not findings: a person triages every one
03

Collaborative review

20% of timeline
  • Verify each other's findings and push each one to its maximum impact
  • Brainstorm the recommendations together

We don't compromise on security.

The team working on your security audit is highly motivated and competitively driven to give you their best.

"One of the most rigorous review processes I've seen - everyone puts in serious effort and coordinates well."

Rigour
@fuzious18
@fuzious18
Team selection

"If I were a protocol team selecting an audit partner, B612 would absolutely be a top choice. They curate incredibly strong teams and handle researcher selection perfectly, carefully matching individual expertise with the specific architecture of the protocol."

@MahdiKarimi81
@MahdiKarimi81
Confidence to deploy

"The team gives their best and researches every detail and after every review I'm confident in the secured code."

@0xT1MOH
@0xT1MOH
Collaboration

"The auditors are great with good ethics, strong collaboration, and most importantly, they're great at finding bugs."

@0xhuy0512
@0xhuy0512